What is Wrong with the Estate of Michael Nesmith?

Home » Blog » What is Wrong with the Estate of Michael Nesmith?
Michael Nesmith
KS and MO Attorney Kyle E Krull

Written by Kyle Krull

Attorney & Counsellor at Law Kyle Krull is president of the Law Offices of Kyle E. Krull, P.A., an Estate Planning Law Firm located in Overland Park, KS. Estate Planning Attorney Kyle Krull has provided continuing education instruction to attorneys, accountants, and financial professionals at local, state, and national programs.

Get To Know Kyle!
POSTED ON: May 16, 2022

The fate of the Michael Nesmith estate is uncertain at this time. It is an all-to-common story. A celebrity dies and leaves behind either no estate plan or an inadequate estate plan. This results in confusion surrounding the fate of the estate. According to a recent Monterey County Weekly article titled “Michael Nesmith's four children […]

The fate of the Michael Nesmith estate is uncertain at this time.

It is an all-to-common story.

A celebrity dies and leaves behind either no estate plan or an inadequate estate plan.

This results in confusion surrounding the fate of the estate.

According to a recent Monterey County Weekly article titled “Michael Nesmith's four children claim there's another will and contest the estate's worth,” the children of Michael Nesmith have brought a challenge to the last will and testament of their father.

Michael Nesmith was a member of the Monkees band.

Michael Nesmith was a successful member of the Monkees band but may have been less successful in his estate planning.

Nesmith was the son of Bette Graham who invented liquid paper.

He too found personal success, but as a member of the Monkees.

Both Nesmith and his mother were proactive in their estate planning.

Bette Graham created the Gihon Foundation in 1977.

While alive, Michael served as the president of the foundation and his four children are members of the board.

As for his own estate planning, Michael Nesmith likely had several last wills.

Although a 2014 handwritten last will was submitted to the Monterey County Superior Court in California in December, the children of Nesmith claim a last will drafted in 1994 was his actual last will.

The children argue the handwritten document submitted to the court was a codicil, or amendment, to the previous last will.

According to the children, the July 8, 2014, document does not revoke the former last will.

The 2014 last will leaves the estate to the aforementioned Gihon foundation.

As of March 17, 2022, the court did not yet have a copy of the 1994 last will.

A subpoena has been sent to the attorney who drafted the 1994 last will, requesting the document to be produced.

Another challenge filed by the children of Michael Nesmith involved the value of the estate.

Cynthia Davis served as the business manager and accountant for Nesmith.

When she filed the court papers after Nesmith died, she estimated the estate was worth $3.6 million and asked to be appointed as the special administrator for the estate.

In contrast, the children assert the estate is only valued at $1.95 million.

They believe the difference in value is due to the inclusion of assets Nesmith left in a trust to his wife in 1994.

Although they did not have a last will to show the court, the children did submit a single-page document signed by Nesmith as trustor of the "1994 Presidential Trust,” along with his wife Victoria Kennedy as a trustee.

Michael Nesmith is an example of how even the best intentions in estate planning can fall short without taking the necessary legal steps to ensure updates are well documented, communicated, and the originals easy to locate.

Reference: Monterey County Weekly (March 23, 2022) “Michael Nesmith's four children claim there's another will and contest the estate's worth”

Share This Post

Get All The Marketing Updates

Blog Silos

Recent Posts

Subscribe to our e-Newsletter and Weekly Blog Digest

Ready to schedule your consultation?

Get Started Now With Harvest Law KC

Get Started Now

REMEMBER: “The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.”
This statement is required by rule of the Supreme Court of Missouri.

Harvest Law KC

5209 W 164th St
Overland Park, KS 66085

Get Directions
IMS - Estate Planning and Elder Law Practice Growth Advisors
Powered by
chevron-down